SINGAPORE CLASSIFIEDS
Singapore Classified Advertisements & Listings from Singapore Expats

Login with Facebook or Google




Saturn in First House – Birth Chart Analysis

Posted By: birthchart

Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022

Price: Best Offer

Mobile: +09999113366

Login to Contact User

In Vedic astrology, Shani is considered a cruel, sinful separatist and vengeful planet. Shani works on the principle of profit and punishment. That is, if the person does good deeds, then Shani rewards him generously. On the other hand, if the native indulges in unrighteous deeds or misdeeds, then Shani also gives appropriate punishment to him. That is why Shani is also called the giver of the fruits of action. With the placement of Saturn in the first house, you can be a person of serious, introverted and reclusive nature. You can be the owner of tall stature. You may be of dark complexion. You can be stubborn, stubborn, determined and indifferent in nature. You can be a serious thinker and a deep thinker. You can be a hard worker and a karma yogi.


https://www.vinaybajrangi.com/planets/saturn/saturn-in-first-house.php
https://www.vinaybajrangi.com/hindi/kundli.php
https://www.vinaybajrangi.com/career-astrology/job-or-business.php
Watch this Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm5b_GlZFHA



Please Login and use the Contact User form to contact the advertiser directly.

Latest Forum Posts

Visit Expat Forum


Re: Thoughts on 377a repeal

If you want to redefine marriage, then can two BFFs marry even though it’s a totally platonic relationship?

Posted in General Discussions

Re: Buying fish in Singapore

Most commercial fish and chips use Cod.

Posted in General Discussions

Re: Thoughts on 377a repeal

❰❰ Quote:
❰❰ Quote:
❰❰ Quote:
But nobody is desecrating marriage, there is no intent to tarnish the definition, rather people just hope to expand it to reflect the reality of relationships today: one that no longer exists exclusively between man and woman.
❱❱
Desecrating of marriage is like in religious context and I believe all we here discuss is limited to the civil rights. But if this is more about personal believes that what is granted as the civil marriage is also sort of sacret then I still see no reason why the relationship of for example, two women is any worse than for a man and a woman.
❱❱

Right, it's important not to conflate civil rights with religious ones.

Posted in General Discussions

Re: Thoughts on 377a repeal

Reviving this thread to discuss something Masagos said in parliament today. The government has chosen not to enshrine the definition of marriage in the constitution, instead leaving that up to future generations. In my opinion, this suggests a quiet openness on the part of the PAP, it's clear that they are aware of the wishes of the younger generation, but have reached this decision as a middle ground between appeasing the more conservative and traditional older generations and the more open and inclusive younger generation.

Posted in General Discussions

Re: Thoughts on 377a repeal

❰❰ Quote:
❰❰ Quote:
❰❰ Quote:Being denied a legal marriage, with zero hope of ever being allowed to was a big blow, but at the time I told my SO, the only thing that matters is that we are together, and we proceeded to stay together for years not knowing if we would ever be allowed to marry. It’s what’s in the heart that matters, not what’s on some piece of paper.
❱❱

So you lived in sin together?
❱❱

We didn’t “live together” before marriage, if that is what you mean. She stayed in her parent’s flat with her sis and BIL, I rented a place outside.

First 2.5 years it was a common room in a 5 room HDB flat for $450/mo. Then post-Asian crisis I got a deal on a room in bungalow for $550/mo for another 2.5 years. I then had a 7 month assignment in the US, but we saw each other at least once a month .....

Posted in General Discussions